conflicting statement by Larry Warren in new video

Just released by Earth Mystery News is a video of Larry Warren presenting his letter as the 1st ever written documentation of Rendlesham.

He uses it to prove his involvement in the events. For example – he claims to have called home and its backed up in the letter so therefore it proves his point. It reinforces and bolsters his claims.

The video itself is very interesting as Larry clearly states that the letter is about the 1st nights events. He also clearly states that he thought that he was called out on the 1st night and the debriefing was not clear on the matter so for two whole years, Larry was under the impression that his involvement occurred on the first night.

So Larry allegedly wrote home and told his mother. At the time of writing Larry would have been under the impression that it all took place on one night, yet in the video clearly states that he was writing specifically about the 1st nights events and not his own.

How did Larry know at the time of writing that he was writing about the first nights events when he didn’t know that the events took place over several nights until two years later?

Its a physical impossibility that Larry could have known exactly what night he was writing about until it was clarified two years later.

Another notable point of interest is that the letter appears to have been post marked before the address was even written- as the W and N in Warren appears to overlap the postmark.

Is this is indeed the case then it nullifies this evidence in a heartbeat.

One thing that struck me almost right away was the aircraft that appear on the headed Air Force envelope.

A derivative of the XF-92A, the Convair F-102A Delta Dagger entered U.S. Air Force service in 1955 as the first operational delta-winged fighter. Although preproduction versions lacked the expected supersonic performance, pinching the waist to provide a “coke bottle” effect resulted in Mach 1.25 capability.

“who can I bullshit today! ” Not a question but a statement reinforced with an exclamation mark.

Then N in Warren appears to look as it was written post stamped as it looks like the N overlaps the stamp. Just my opinion on a simple observation.

An impossibility if the item was  genuine.

Then there is the back of the letter itself.

Larry states that the mother was a book keeper and that she doodled some sums on the back of the envelope. I found this a bit odd. There was Larry, thousands of miles away, writing home to his mother. A cherished letter from her son, from half way around the world. She keeps this treasured communication for all prosperity. An item that any mother would want to keep forever. But Larry’s mother decided to deface that treasured item with no regard for the thought and effort her son had made to getting that letter to her. I found that very odd.

Larry states his mother was a bookkeeper and that this was her doing some bookkeeping. I did the math….. Something else didn’t add up…

while is a certainty that 9 x 40 =360 when its added to 950 ( which is shown below the 360) the total equals 1310 so if this is indeed a calculation that is being done then the total figure of 1110.00 is off by a total of 200. Shoddy record keeping.

Its her handwriting he states: But there is also a problem with that statement as well.

Because the writing stylisation of the numbers appear to look extremely similar to the handwriting traits of Larry Warren. This is not a CLAIM OR STATEMENT but a simple note of observation.

They look the same:

The six and the zero (above) on the envelope , stated by Warren to be his mothers writing is also similar to the sample  which was taken from the handwritten letter of provenance for items sold by Larry Warren in  2011. The writing (60’s) is allegedly by Charlie Lennon.

If indeed by pure chance it turned out that this was not the handwriting of his mother and Charlie Lennon and Larry was behind both- then it would mean that Larry is not being truthful about the letter. So why would Larry feel the need to lie about the letter?

It makes perfect sense that IF Larry is lying then Larry could only be lying about the letter for one reason.

The letter was a fake piece of evidence that was constructed in order to add weight to Warrens claims of involvement.

If proper forensic document examination is carried out on this letter, this would settle the matter.

It’s easy enough to obtain a USAF envelope, couple of stamps and a custom made ink stamper.