MOVE OVER BOB LAZAR

Bob Lazar, the man who claims UFOs run on Element 115 and allegedly worked at S4 has become a well known name for his claims of allegedly back engineering alien technology but science does not agree with him or Corbells claims. Nor do what they both have to say corrospond in any way shape or form with my research findings. Im a chef to trade, so I know how to go about preparing cooking and presenting a quality dish for mass consumption and I know what key ingredients are required to make that possible.

So im not a physicist and I dont claim to have worked at S4 at any point in my life. However, in the 80s , I too wore glasses like the ones Bob Lazar did. Everyone did. You see the problem with Lazars claims dont stand up to the facts and his claims are just as unstable as element 115 itself. Whats kinda interesting about Bob’s tale is that it actually pales in comparison to what I went on to accomplish in 2021, when I returned to revisit my earlier STS103 research. For I went on to reverse engineer a real alien spacecraft that appeared in orbit 23 years ago from my living room. Crazy eh?

More unfolded as a result of writing this article.

If we rewind back to 2012, lets listen to the theory I had developed as early as then. Apologies for the shakey video…..

On May 3rd, 2022, while writing this article and watching this video, I noted the positions of the lasers on the edited image of frame STS103-734-69 matched the locations of the two nodules i formally identified late in December 2021. With that, I immedieatly documented the discovery in a short video before going on to present an overlap of the nodules from frame 73. I was stunned to see I had been sitting on confirmation of my theory since 2012. I was also spot on with my theory of the process involved and how the entire hull of the craft was designed to accomodate light to traverse around its surface.

Here is that overlap of frames 69 and 73 next to my 2021 depiction of the direction these lasers travel. (from frame 73) Now my assessment of the operational capabilities of this craft have now been presented , vaidating my 2012 theory. Not only that, but this formal identification of these nodules matching the heights and positioning of the details found in frame 69 now also validate the presence of this craft for about the seventh time. I will run though these in a seperate future article.

The first thing that I noticed in 2012 while reviewing these images was the area that I later identified as the left headlight of the craft. This appears visible on frames 69/73/74.

This area here, seen above was the first second indication that there was indeed something in this frame, albeit, 99.9% invisible to the naked eye. Especially on the Gateway to Astronauts Photography of the earth record of this mission frame. As i learned in May 2022, the record that is held on the National Archives website the spacecraft is much more pronounced and would have saved a lot of time back in 2012. My first big indicator this craft was indeed in this frame was the fact that it appears also in the frames before and after this was taken. It was logic that did the rest. The National Archives copy seen here below with both the JSC/Earthweb copy and the copy provided to me from Kai Stoffers back in 2012 at my request.
https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/DatabaseImages/ISD/highres/STS103/STS103-734-69_3.JPG

After first identifying this matching detail on both frames , it was my first real clue that this craft was directly in front of the HST briefly, taking a close up inspection. After examining the angles that these images were all taken, it was established that the size and angle this feature appears in these two images discounted any incorrect assumption that this was being caused by a reflection. Further research was then carried out on this frame in an attempt to see this detail in optimum visability and STS103-734-69 was then subjected to an extensive analysis. By editing the contrast and brightness and GRB levels, many copies of this frame was saved during the process. I made the decision to create these into a montage in order to present a overlapped visual medium of this process to the show light as it was applied and removed. This was later carried out and uploaded in 2014. Shown below.

The video served an important purpose as well as a timestamped record of my research. Previously, I had miss-identified the upper left laser as a double image of the support bar for the upper solar panal, despite my suspicions that this was indeed one of the lasers being seen. In May 2022, while piecing this article together, I correctly concluded that the termination points of the lines ended exactly where the raised glareshield is located, housing the two nodules. These two nodules were identified at the end of 2021 as the projection units for the lasers that fire up the two trenches located at either side of the front of the craft. .

The two upward facing nodules behind this raised area were formally identified in December 2021 as the origin point of the lasers which are aimed into the two trenches.
Source :NASA https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/DatabaseImages/ISD/highres/STS103/STS103-734-73_3.JPG
Above: This is what is being observed below in frame 58

Same process in real life
Above: The screenshot of the video showing the position of the lasers in frame STS103-734-69 highlighted in red, overlapped on STS103-734-73 with the nodules which project these beams.

Discovering that these nodules were the source/ origin point for these lasers all came down to my laymans understanding of the craft itself. During the summer of 2021, my understanding of this craft and how it operates took a turn when I applied what I termed as ‘deep-thought’. This ‘full-time’ thought process unlocked and translated what I was looking at when studying the structred craft and the many details on its hull. The moment that I realised that everything I was looking at was the result of form and function- everything changed. The enigma melted away and what replaced it was clarity. It was a long drawn out process but akin to developing a photograph print in very slow motion. The magic of seeing all these features suddenly appear with their role and function screaming out at me was quite something to take in. Now as far back as 2012 and as evident in that video, you hear me describe the actual process that this craft employs in order to cloak its presence. Its weird looking back to then as it would appear that I nailed it a decade ago when it came to describing the operational capabilities of this alien craft.

To actually have confirmation that I was correct a decade ago, is , well, unsettling. Once the concept of form and function took hold, my admiration for this crafts overall design grew tenfold. Its kinda hard to try explain when it all fell into place for me but to the best of my knowledge , Im sure it all started when I went back and reviewed the very first piece of evidence that i had picked up on back in 2012 of the details i termed the ‘squiggles’. It was while staring at these and applying ‘deep-thought’ that the term ‘form and function’ jumped into my head. Then it became clear to me that this rounded curvature of the hull was designed specifically to allow light to travel across its surface. I think that was the Eurika moment because after that, gradually the features of this alien space craft would reveal to me their secrets and slowly but surely introduce themselves to me properly.

At some point I clicked that the strong contrast in the color tone on these ‘squiggles’ on STS103-734-69 was actually light captured in the photograph, running across these features. Thats when I understood the need for these ‘squiggles’ to have been designed in the way they are. This smooth edged curvature was done to facilitate light to traverse over it. The trenches were the elephant in the room and it later became clear that these were an intergral part of the craft and had been designed specifically for the purpose of acting as a ‘racetrack’ for the projected lasers. They are there to guide the lasers around the ship. The ‘squiggles’ were the first major stepping stone to understanding the technical and operational capabilities and general understanding of this craft. After identifying the need to design this area above and below the headlight housing in this arrangment to allow the continuation of freeflowing light to traverse around the perimeter of the hull, so much more surrendered their secrets and revealed their function.

This concept of light traversing across the hull beame pivital to completing the puzzle and solving the mystery of the final design of the craft seen in these redeployment images.

Then in June 2021 i got creative with my thinking and once again, deep thought into these images yeilded further results- or rather-revelations. I guess its a bit crazy trying to convey what happened but it knocked the wind right out me, was completely out the blue, completely unexpected and painted a new reality I wasnt ready for. It was this line of thinking that led to the numerous discoveries that were to follow as a direct occurance after this experiment I had been curious enough to indulge in.

The first major breakthrough that I had was June 10th 2021, when i identified the shadow of Canadarm on the hull of the craft in frame 73. seen just above the spotlight housing. The spotlight was identified when I realised that this is what is seen activated in frame 59 and realised that the area seen at the front of this craft was the housing for this huge spotlight seen in frames 73/74. Once I finally realised that this was spotlight housing, it was now the details around its circumfrance which interested me. This is where things suddenly changed and my ability to translate the features of this craft became a rapid ability and all of the pieces started to just fall into place. I started to suspect that the double barrel features on the spotlights circumfrance were possibly additional recessed lighting which were spread around the spotlight. This prompted me to take a close look at them and I noted that the layout -if it was lighting, was arranged in such a way that if torchbeams were to come from them, they would create a third residual beam of light from the two coming from these ‘barrels’ which would split against the pyramid sloped edge it falls onto. This explained the approaching yellow lights in frames 66,67,68. It was these first three redeployment images popped into my head while I postulated over this and suddenly I had the bright idea to now perform an overlap of frames 68 over frame 73 to test this theory. It was at this point when , I lined these images up, that I snapped into a prolonged flashback which brought about fresh recollection to events 23 years ago. My experiment was also a 100% hand in glove match and showed that these recessed areas were indeed the source of these yellow lights approaching Discovery in frames 66/67/68. As shown here…

After overlapping these images and slotting them into place, it instantly triggered the flashback to my encounter on December 11th 1999. I recalled standing in front of the craft while it had had its spotlight on before it switched off and then a light show began before it grew brighter from the top, became covered in light and then imploded in front of me.

After establishing that these were recessed lighting around the spotlight, the need for the raised curved area at the top of the spotlight housing was then identified as a glareshield- raised up to prevent glare from this lighting.

Below showing the lighting arrangment overlapped on frame 51 and STS103-734-73 encircling the positions of numbers 1, 2 and 3 on the aforementioned frame (51)

In conducting this simple exercise, I now could also present physical evidence for Ed Bartons description of a ”rising sun battleflag of rays of light”. I too had obseved this same effect on December 4th 1999. It was after this flashback that was when I realised that my experiences, the STS103 craft and the Illinois case are all intertwinned, all three cases connected by a common thread. All three cases provide corroborating evidence in each case. All three clearly now identified as all connected to a single common source. Another breakthough happened back in 2018 when I was conducting an experiment, trying to build up a better idea of the profile of this craft. At some point I decided to try merge the details found on the alien craft with its spotlight on as seen in the distance of frame 59. In this frame, light is seen reflecting on its hull and I decided to take a copy of the edited NASA frame 69 where i exposed the oval craft with its curvature clearly shown. So I took this frame and then overlapped it with frame 59 and followed the angle of curvature on frame 69 as my guide when sizing the two images up to extend and compare with frame 59. So my objective was to get the angle of these images correct in an attempt to build up a better profile of the craft and an unexpected result confirmed my 2012 identification of the features that were first termed as squiggles back in 2012. After matching up the curvature and making this photo-fit profile, the formal identification of the same details on the opposite side were now spotted and I now had an exact symetrical opposite to the ‘squiggles’ that are seen on STS103-734-69. My experiment achieved a 100% mission objective and I realised now that I was in most likehood, now looking at the front profile of this craft.

HEADLIGHTS

It was after I carried out ‘Project Wheelbarrow’ in 2018 that it became apparent that I had now identified the front profile of this craft and discovered the addition of the same details first identified in 2012.

Frame 59 encircled in red, frame 69 in yellow. Both identical features, were later identified as the headlights. I attempted a partial technical drawing to show the arrangement as shown below with spotlight added.

After this, the two dark circular areas located on each side , sandwiched between these squiggles were then identified as recessed headlights. This was another landmark moment in understanding not just the STS103 mission images but would play an important role in me cracking the Illinois January 5th 2000 encounters. These headlights were a promant feature that stuck with me as I had also aquired another three UFO reports containing this very feature in reports from Australia, the USA and the UK. I will be discussing these events in my upcoming Solving Illinois article, to be published antime shortly after this evidence goes to press.

The Trenches

The left hand side trench with notch cut out side of headlight housing. I know why this notch was cut.

The trenches were the big obvious feature that really stick out on this craft and I went on to understand that this-once again, was INTERGRAL to the craft in form and function and realised that these trenches were designed to act as a guide for these lasers to be projected onto and around the ship. This turned out to be a 100% accurate assessment of these features. My earlier assessment of the ‘squiggles’ was reafirmed. It was at that point that i realised that every design feature on the hull of this craft was specifically designed to allow light to traverse unhindered around its hull. This was another landmark moment. Later, I would go on to discover the design need for the paneling or etchings that run across the skin of this alien craft. The final design of this craft incorperates these two trenches as they are required to accomodate the increase in the laser flow, which starts out as two lasers but rapidly increase in volume as the lasers shoot back and forth and multiply and grow in number as they are bounced of a mirror , ever multiplying in number during this operation. It was the clean up job that I had done to NASA frame STS103-734-58 that assisted develop my working theory on the processes involved, that this craft was demonstrating as the craft began to cloak its presence as it moved position from frame 58 to frame 59 that helped me identify the trench feature and in doing so , was then able to orintate the craft by overlapping the rendering over the body of the craft in frame 73. Forty-eight hours later, I had confirmation of my finding when i got the copy of STS103-734-59 returned, after it had been cleaned up by a hired freelancer. This independant confirmation of what I discovered verified my theory and cemented this theory as correct and valid. I had now positivly identified the purpose that these trenches served -as racetracks for the rotating lasers as they traversed the hull of the craft.

The Canopy

The canopy area itself became under scrutany and was later compared with the one from the UFO from the 2007- 2009 Turkey footage and they appear to share identical flat v shaped canopys.

Both have identical canopy layouts. 50/50 blend overlap of the Turkey UFO with STS103-734-69

In STS103-734-58, the blue feature to the right of the image was formally identified after I paid to have this image cleaned up, restored and rendered professionally in order to see the two entities in more clarity. Early in January 2022, I then went on to determine that this rendred image showed the same multiple lasers with spacing equal to the same width as the trenches.

i noticed the trench….eventually!

I then decided to take the structured craft in STS103-734-73 and overlap it with this rendered copy in order to get the orintation of this spacecraft in frame STS103-734-58. Another piece of evidence was now on the table and it showed evidence that confirmed my theory of the trenches being designed as a ‘racetrack’ for these lasers. Within days, I would then go on to identify the design application for all the notches and ‘paneling’ that cover the entire skin of the craft.

The craft is in the process of cloaking but my overlap fitted hand in glove and I was now able to determine the orintation and exact position of the craft in frame 58. Two days after discovering this, I got the result back from frame 59 after also paying to have it cleaned up to see ‘Adam’ again.

The rendered copy of frame 59, exposed the craft which is unseen in the NASA image, performing what I had just learned independantly by performing the overlap. Another breakthrough moment.

THE NODULES

Next was the two nodules located on the raised ‘glareshield’ that were identified.

After spotting the termination points of the horizontal lasers in frame 70 i then looked at frame 73 and the spotlight housing and noticed nodules with what appeared to be extremely feight thin beams coming from them, so I marked out their paths and was shocked and delighted to learn that that they were both aimed directly up these two trenches! This validated my working theory that I had developed as far back as 2012. But the best bit was still to come. The overall unifying theory of how this craft operated was topped off with the understanding that the paneling served a very important design need. Then, it was the paneling that was finally understood and I appeared to now have a full working knowledge of what was going on with this craft. I suddenly realised that as the lasers shot along these trenches, they would trickle into all these etchings and spread over the hull. This reaffirmed my theory that the hull of the craft was designed to accomodate light to recycle around it. Then it became clear that is what is being observed in the rendered copy of frame 58 with the ‘weaving light’ wrapping around the craft as it begins to cloak. This-once again was yet another breakthrough moment as a lot of things then fell into place. I realised I had figured out the actual process involved in the very observations I had observed during 1999 of the blue/white oval craft.

Further evidence was aquired independantly by my knowledge of events of worldwide UFO reports as well as my own personal observations that same December. Eyewitness testimony from Melvern Noll and officer Ed Barton provided corroborating evidence. It became clear to me that i had already aquired substantial evidence which supported what had learned from these STS103 images. Footage from Shanghai and Hessdalen confirm what i had literally’ back engineered’ on the craft. Both of these pieces of evidence show plasma trails. I found plasma bubbles in various stages of decay on STS103 mission image STS103-734-76.

Shanghai Dec 3rd 1999

This was also heavily backed up by the evidence found on STS103-734-76 with plasma bubbles seen in various stages of decay. Now knowing that this craft was weaving these lasers around its hull, it was now obvious that it was building up a plasma charge and then ejecting it as a source of propulsion. The big factor was the etchings and when it was understood that just like the trenches, they too served as tracks for this laser light to traverse along the hull.I was in bed trying to imaging the route that these lasers make when i suddenly jumped up after visualising it. It was a rejoiceful moment. All of this energy was being recycled and recycled over and over as the lasers travel across the ship,trickling into the etchings like tributaries from a river and as it is co,pressed into these etchings the thermal enegy of the compression is increased again and again, in turn building up a plasma cocoon which surrounds the craft. This layer of plasma then reduces the ships mass when propeling the craft, thus allowing it to become almost massless. The photo from Shanghai, the footage from Norway and the reconstructed description of Ed Bartons sighting by Darryl Barker all show this process in operation during flight.

Ed Bartons description, reconstructed by Darryl Barker in the Edge of Reality documentary.
Photo credit ;Daryll Barker

Above: I observed one of these craft at estimated distance of just 700ft begin this process before seeming to implode on December 4th 1999. I now know it merely cloaked. After this encounter i experienced a strange dream.

If i can figure out how this craft operates from my home,just imagine what NASA really know.

So thats what the bulk of what I went on to discover on the redeployment images but there was still much much more to follow. For example, my knowledge gained from the redeployment sequence , along with my own personal observations and knowledge of the Illinois case, understanding everything i did all led to the Illinois case being solved by what I had exposed on these official NASA mission images. It was clear now that the structured object in these images had a massive spotlight situated at the front of the craft. This spotlight is seen activated on STS103-734-69. Figuring out that these were craft with headlights and a big spotlight then assissted in explaining the bright spotlight in previous mission images taken earlier than night. Frames 49,50.51,52,53.

Having now identified both the headlights as well as the spotlight ,descriptions of similar objects seen around the globe only reinforced what I had found on these official NASA mission images. It was clear from the reports I had underlined of triangular UFOs with matching ”headlights” from around the globe exactly what is captured in these mission images. After identifying the craft which appears in frames 57/58/59 as having a higher up observation deck and then hearing Melvern Nolls description echo through my mind, i instantly knew It is a 100% match to the craft he observed over Illinios eleven days later. The STS103/Illinois cases were connected in more ways than one. Officer Ed Barton stated he observed ”headlights” which became ”one big light”, matching both features on this craft. Furthermore, his description of the beams of light appearing ”like a Japanese battleflag is another feature I identified on the spotlight housing of this craft. Then we have officer Craig Stephens description of a craft which ‘tried to project the starfield above it, below it’ is a strong resemblance to what is being seen in frames 73/74.

2022

The other week, on April 25th , the day after Hubble celebrated its 32nd anniversary in orbit, I performed another experiment on these mission images that turned up yet another unexpected diamond. I decided to take the exposed craft in the edited copy of STS103-734-69 and mirror it and then overlap it with itself. The intention was to create a reconstruction showing this craft over a road, to demonstrate the matching similarity with eyewitness Brian Renworths testimony of craft which resembled ”an island in the middle of the road and on both sides”. But upon mirroring and overlapping to demonstrate this, i noticed something very interesting. A double image of the headlights is present. The craft was projecting an image of itself onto the screen created by these lasers. Suddenly, I realised that the partial double image on frames 73/74 was not a result of refraction but was a process being employed by the craft itself.

Here you can see the repeated image of the headlights…..

A double image of the craft is seen repeated here. The entire skin of the craft has been designed to allow light to traverse its entire surface area. Upon seeing this double image, it became clear that the double image seen on frames 73/74 is being created by the craft. This was only realised on April 25th 2022.

It was an unexpected development but now i have evidence supporting exactly the same process as seen on the unedited NASA frames 73/74 with the double image being projected. .

https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/DatabaseImages/ISD/highres/STS103/STS103-734-73_3.JPG

https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/DatabaseImages/ISD/highres/STS103/STS103-734-74_3.JPG

In June 2021, the realisation that i was looking at a grouping of entities at the bottom of frame STS103-734-58 was the combination of knowing there were two craft docked beside Discovery in the previous frame, complete with clues that confirmed this which can be seen through and behind the solar meshing as well as the big bank of windows from the same craft at the bottom of the image.

On January 6th 2022, upon recieving the cleaned up copy of frame 59 back from the freelancer , the

May 4th 2022

Another Eurika moment. Up until this point , I was under the impression that the craft which was seen docked beside Discovery in frame 25,57,58 and 59 (containing ‘Adam’ and ‘Buzz’) had departed to a safe distance during the build up to the actual redeployment taking place. Now, because I had already had frame STS103-734-59 rendered , I knew that the reflection of Hubbles solar array is seen on the window of their craft and that knowledge was picked up on when I went back and reviewed frames 66,67 and 68. Now I was fixated on the area at the bottom of these frames, I quickly identified these dark wavy stripes as the shadow of the solar array meshing, meaning something was there also. Then for the first time, I seen whats been in full view but remained undetermined up until then. The reflection of Hubbles support bar is reflected once again in these images. I was shaken once again to discover this was windows directly beside Hubble , explaining the partial double image of the support bar. -Its merely its image reflected on the glass of the craft these entities are inside.

Learning that the craft was still docked alongside Discovery during the redeployment was heavy shock to the system. To now learn that these aliens were still directly alongside Discovery and Hubble while the actual redeployment took place jolted me into an unexpected re-evaluation of these mission images as now I would have to return to further study them once again with a higher level of scrutiny than ever before. A new reevaluation of NASAs involvment with aliens was also now required.

Conclusion

The evidence gathered in these mission photographs show that a considerable level of trust has already been established between NASA and these entities. There also appears to be cooperation between both parties which suggests communication between them. The lack of panic, distress or alarm in the STS103 crew and ability for them to perform their asigned tasks while all of this was taking place shows a lack of regard for events occuring outside the orbiter. Undaunted the STS103 crew opperated to maximum efficiancy without any visible signs of panic, amazement, distress or fear. This on its own, speaks volumes in understanding the casual attitude that the crew members had to the intense alien activity around the orbiter.

The conclusion reached is that NASA are already cosying up with an alien civilisation who has taken a special interest in earth. The interspecies cooperation suggests that this was not NASAs first encounter with these beings. For the proximity of this craft beside Discovery , its also abundently clear that a certian level of trust has to be involved and that trust has to first be established. Building relationships takes time. So, its pretty clear from these mission records that NASA are co-operating with an alien civilisation and keeping this little relationship secret from the rest of Humanity. There is no room for doubt in these mission records show trust and cooperation and there is zero chance the STS103 crew were somehow unaware of their visitors that December 25th. So anything you hear NASA director Bill Nelson say abut UAPs is an outright lie. How is it remotely possible that NASA cant find evidence of aliens yet I could on their own public servers? More importantly, how is it possible Luis Elizondos claims can hold water when he states that the Pentagon are still trying to find out who is the intelligence behind UAPs even today?

How is is even possible he worked for the Pentagon between 2008-2017 attempting to identify these UAPs when NASA/DoD/Pentagon were already working in conjunction with aliens in 1999?

He cant answer that because he is not being straight with the public. There is no way the Pentagon were attempting to identify what UAPs were after 1999 thats for sure. So whats the angle?

The angle is that the Pentagon/DoD/NASA/ESA/SETI etc etc are all involved in psycological warefare with the human race. We are being bombarded 24/7 with lie after lie. Its all state propaganda, straight out of Nazi Germany. The James Webb telescope is a 10 billion dollar vanity project, launched to distract like a golden squirril in space. The current thrust of the Pentagon psy-op is to convince the public that they do not have the answers despite really trying to find out. The onslaught of video clips were touted as the best footage they had and it was all garbage. All of it. Seasoned journalists and professional Ufologists all fell for it and the Pentagon UAP report was published. No evidence of aliens was found. Allegedly 22 million spent doing so. Two weeks prior to this report being made public, i received the rendering of STS103-734-58 and discovered ‘Adam’ and ‘Buzz’ and the publication of the Pentagon UAP report was now either a complete lie or the biggest intelligence failure in human history. The Pentagon could find no evidence of aliens yet I had already done so on one of their own NASA.GOV public servers.

So for those that think its crazy to believe that the Pentagon to be covering up the existance of inteligent civilizations visiting earth and secretly conspring with aliens, please go home and think again. After now re-evaluating NASAs relationship with these entities on STS103, it became clear from the mission records that there was no concern, no panic, no signs of distress. This was incredibly telling. So when i went back and reviewed STS31, I came across SOMETHING I PICKED UP ON YEARS AGO IN 2012. Then I went on to discoverer another diamond on the National Archives website when I found another mission image from STS61 showing that a craft was also pulled up alongside the orbiter during the redeployment if Hubble during that mission also. It is identical to the details found on STS103-734-66,67,68. Then theres the big cube that appears on STS125-Hubbles final servicing mission. So now, here today, in 2022, i now have evidence of a working relationship going back 32 years covering multiple Hubble servicing missions. So, dont believe king snake Bill Nelson because he is now an established liar and no friend to humanity. NASA are engaged in a psy-op to deny humans the truth. NASA is parenting humanity and this goes directly against their mission statement.

The Public Hearings on UAPS

On May 18th 2022, I was subjected to a cheaply made low budget horror show that was the UAP hearings. The Pentagon is still very concerned about commercial 737s flying over the Pacific ocean when filmed by nightvision. It was a complete charade. I felt violated. I swiftly messaged the under secetery for defence and offered to assist them and asked him to tell Bill Nelson to pog mahone while i was at it.This is all theater. its garbage being dumped on humanity. (UAP=Universally Accepted Piffle)

Solving Illinois

It really began when I identified the spotlight and headlight features but it wasnt until I first turned my attention to frame 58 and realised there was multiple arches but only two were fully visible because light was obscured from leaving them. It was then that i realised this was likely being caused by people gathered at these windows and then I realised the two wispy features at the top of the image , therefore were in the same craft, only in a higher up observation deck.

It was after identifying these were windows that i realised this was a solid craft with internal lighting being obstructed from exiting them, complete with silhouette of bipedal entity nearest, leading to frame 58 getting cleaned up by a photo expert, revealing the true identity of ‘Adam’.

This was when Melvern Nolls description jumped into my head. This is the moment I knew it was all connected. Within just three days of discovering Adam, the Illinois encointers were also solved.

More on this soon!

For more information, check out http://www.corroboratedevidence.com

Leave a comment