In 2021, NASA director stated ”We don’t know what it is” when talking about UFOs/UAPs. He lied. NASA lie, the Pentagon lie. They all lie. SETI senior astronomer Seth Shostak stated on UFO Conspiracy road trip ”….there is no conspiracy to keep secrets in science…” This statement was also 100% inaccurate. Luis Elizondo is currently on the UFO circus headlining act and he has also stated that AATIP doesn’t know the intelligence behind these unidentified objects in our skies. He lied. Jeremy Corbell is ranting about element 115 making claims it can be weaponized. He lied. However, it should be pointed out that his claims are more stable than element 115. Last year, UAPs were a hot topic, with numerous videos and photos presenting a Batman balloon as a threat to aviators. It was all BS. Even seasoned UFO researchers and journalists and filmmakers bought into the psyop that went into overdrive in the build-up to the release of the civilian uap report, published last June 25th.

I. HOWEVER, WAS IN A UNIQUE POSITION.

I happened to be the guy who had multiple close-range experiences during December 1999 and submitted the longest British MOD UFO report FOR 1999. As a result of my encounters, I went on to research this subject matter and for over a decade, indulged in ‘The UFO Investigation of the Millennium”, searching, collecting and cataloging eyewitness UFO reports made during December 1999. At first, I had no idea how exactly I was going to execute this investigation- I had no previous experience in this field and with no idea just exactly how I was going to be able to disprove the British MoD.

BUT I DIDNT THINK ABOUT IT-I JUST GOT ON WITH IT.

I started at the beginning (always a good place to begin) and penned a written account of my experiences in 2001. From there an official line of inquiry led to numerous replies to my inquiries but soon i realized that I was getting driven in circles and appeared to be on the ‘information merry-go-round’. It was after my visit to the temple of the sky god Horus in Egypt in 2003, that my investigation spread its wings. I began to collect UFO reports made during the same time frame and used my written account as a ‘Rosetta stone’ to look for similar key descriptions contained within my own account. For the next seven years, this collection of reports grew to over 200 individual sighting reports- all made during December 1999. I had scores of matching descriptions but something else happened by accident. As I collected these reports, the initial objective was to try track the UFO movements across the globe as the month progressed. The time zones varied obviously, so it was essential for me to ‘tame’ them. By taking the decision to format these reports into a GMT timeline, a chronological timeline was established and these reports were filed in an orderly liniar structure/manner, making the ‘tracking’ easier. I quickly realized that there was multiple events that took place simultaneously during that month. It was at that point that I realized I was dealing with a bigger workload than I first anticipated at the outset. It was clear that there was much more activity taking place with more than one craft being responsible for all of these reports. Then in May 2010, my attention was drawn to two photos taken on STS103. Then in October 2010, another mission image was presented which contained a solid physical object. Other research took priority at the time and it was not until 2012 that my investigations led me back to these images. By 2012, I had also completed a bullet point historical overview of the UFO subject, going as far back as 1898. This allowed me the opportunity to cover man’s early exploits into space. In 2001, Martyn Stubbs published the NASA- the smoking gun, the secret Nasa Transmissions. NASA had stated that these objects were simply ice crystals and space debris. I was working on the events of December 1999 and had completed daily entries of reports leading up to December 18th, and was now turning my attention to December 19th- the date Discovery was launched to repair Hubble. As instantly as this was recalled, so were the three NASA STS103 images I had learned about two years beforehand. So now my schedule had opened right up and I was now focused on STS103. I decided that I wanted to go in search of other images in the hope I could find further evidence of this structured object in frame 73. This is where my UFO Investigation turned a corner and went from gathering circumstantial evidence to reviewing official NASA mission records. The significance of what this meant to my research was not underestimated. I knew that there was potentially something within these mission records that could alter the course of my investigation. And I was correct. What began as a simple exercise, then led to something much more substantial. By changing the numerical value/frame number on the URL links, I gained access to every image taken on roll 734. I then downloaded them and discovered that there is a sequence of ten images taken during Hubble’s redeployment that all contained this solid physical object.

At the time, I was focused on solely trying to determine if this object was either a reflection or a solid object in orbit with Discovery. So I focused on examining the redeployment sequence of the ten frames from frame 66 to 76. This was in August 2012. At the end of that month, I shocked myself at what I had went on to uncover and expose on these mission images. Several individual pieces of key information was also acquired which confirmed my own findings.

But I need to lay this out bit by bit. it just didn’t suddenly happen. It was a long and well-thought-out process that led to this discovery. This first big clue was that details were evident on all ten of these mission images but frame 69 appeared to be the odd one out in the set at first glance. This made zero sense logically as both frames 68 and 70 contained evidence of this craft. After paying special attention to STS103-734-69, it became clear that the feint details that are seen on the image were the same details that also appear on the hull of the craft in frames 73/74. After identifying this feature and pairing it with the bodywork of the craft on frames 73/74, it suddenly became clear that I was looking at the same object in frame 69. Further research was applied to eliminate any remote possibility that it could be caused by a reflection and the angles at which both images were taken into consideration. By doing this, it was clear that there was no way that this object could be a reflection solely based on the position in both images were taken. So, now I knew it was not a reflection and I also knew it contained the same features as seen on the hull of the object in frames 73/74. So now I began to enhance this detail in the hope I could see it in detail. On August 31st, 2012, after editing this detail while zooming in, I saved the image and then opened it up. I was shocked to see that I had been oblivious to understanding that I had edited the entire image and not just that one feature. Before me was an oval-shaped object with a large dark area over it on the right-hand side. This is where my training as a photographer came into play. After donning my photographer’s hat, the perplexing issue of what this darkened area could be suddenly was no more. After realizing that this dark area was in obvious stark contrast to the area around it, it became clear that this dark area was being caused by a lack of light hitting that particular surface area. That lack of light had to have been caused by something obstructing that light from reaching that surface area. The number of objects that could be causing this was limited to two. Discovery and Hubble. Then it hit me like a train. It was at that point I realized that I had been staring at the shadow profile of the Hubble Space Telescope all that time. And then I realized that this shadow of Hubble proved that this was indeed a solid physical object in orbit. I had just verified that the object in frame 73 was indeed present in frame 69.

That was the moment I knew that I had something special. Now next came the confirmation of what I exposed. Turning to the mission highlights resource tape, further evidence showed that the Orbiter and Hubble were both bathed in direct sunlight during the redeployment. NASA’s own records also stated that sunrise occurred over Australia’s Gold Coast as the redeployment took place. So now I had, the matching details from frames 73/74, visual confirmation on the Highlights tape and further documentation from NASA’s own records with regard to the sunrise occurring during that time period. Plus I also knew that light can’t pass through solid objects so all of this data came into reinforce what it was I had exposed on frame 69.

After establishing that I had indeed exposed the hidden presence of a cloaked alien craft on STS103-734-69, I KNEW I NOW HAD SOMETHING MORE SUBSTANTUAL THAN I EVER WOULD HAVE done without this line of investigation.

In 2013, I presented ion to this information to Marc Dantonio who attempted to tell me I was wrong simply because I didn’t have 30 years of experience as an image expert. Marc Dantonio did his research by proclamation and simply refused to listen. In doing so, he tarnished the reputation of MUFON and its mission statement. I have never encountered so much unprofessionalism in one man in my life. But I digress. Knowing Marc was 100% as he had not done the research, I boldly went on to publish these findings on July 8th 2014. A significant date in UFO history. I had no idea that Corroborating Evidence would go on to become the top four-selling UFO title on Amazon and remained as a best seller for 16 weeks so it was rewarding to get a top seller on the subject of UFOs.

Four years later…..

In 2018 circumstances in my life brought me to revisit my earlier research into STS103. While reviewing my earlier work, I noticed that the blue-white object in frame 59 had light running along the edge of this craft. So I decided to attempt a photofit reconstruction with the edited copy of frame 69 and matched up the curvatures on both images- and as I did so, realized that I had now also discovered the same feature that I first identified on frame 69 in 2012. Only it was the symmetrical opposite feature. I realized that I had now identified the front profile of this craft. Later in 2021, I would go on to formally identify these features as the ‘headlights’ situated at the front of the craft. These headlights that I identified would become essential to understanding not just the STS103 images but also another UFO mystery that occurred eleven days later in Illinois on January 5th 2000.

Bill Nelson is the director of NASA. NASA work, believe it or not, hand in glove with the DoD and the DoD works hand in glove with the Pentagon. The same Pentagon that allegedly set up AATIP in 2007 to determine the origin source of UFOs. You only need to visit NASA’s own image archives to see the monumental blunder someone within the imaging department made when releasing these images into the public domain. What lies in full available access to the public is evidence of alien activity during STS103. The mission photos clearly show the STS103 crew carrying out their designated tasks with zero concern for the events surrounding them in orbit. These images show that NASA is involved in clandestine operations with these entities and cooperation is taking place between them. Co-operation suggests communication, which could well explain the need for a craft to be docked beside Disvovery for —hrs and forty minutes. If aliens can pass within two feet of Hubble, then NASA know well that alien civilizations are visiting earth. And if NASA knows, Bill Nelson knows and if Bill Nelson knows, then so does the DoD. And if the DoD knows, then the Pentagon knows. STS103 took place during December 1999, a full eight years prior to AATIP allegedly being established by the same Pentagon that knew aliens existed in the previous millennium. Bill Nelson not only lied to the American taxpayer but he lied to humanity and should apologize prior to stepping down. The facts remain, the Pentagon knew in 1999.

Nasa chief Bill Nelson on seeing Earth from space:

‘It looks so fragile. I wanted to be when I returned, a better steward of our planet.”

Bill Nelson is an established liar.

Still believe Luis Elizondo?

HIS STORY DOES NOT ADD UP.- Stephen Greenfield and John Greenwald have both presented ample evidence that Lue Elizondo is not being truthful about his claims and it’s now been very well established that AATIP never existed to begin with.

A conclusion I reached independently by examining the STS103 mission image archives and discovering that NASA was already very well introduced to the aliens that appeared on the STS103 mission images by the time 1999 arrived. Making AATIP obsolete years before Elizondo even opened his mouth.

It’s part of the current psyop that’s been getting rolled out over the last few years. The UAP report has now been published. I have not and shall not be bothering to waste any of my time reading it. But what I have learned, there is more content in an Aero chocolate bar. More information is currently being prepared for release.

. Please standby.

NASA DIRECTOR CAUGHT SHAPESHIFTING DURING INTERVIEW SEE HERE FOR EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE